Standing on the Shoulders of Giants (Who Fell): How Failed Startups Pave the Way for Success

Standing on the Shoulders of Giants (Who Fell): How Failed Startups Pave the Way for Success

The Product-Market Mismatch

One of the most common culprits behind the failure of a startup is the lack of a fundamental connection between the product and the market. A study revealed that this mismatch is the leading cause of failure globally, accounting for 42% of cases. Take the tale of the promising fashion and retail startup Yepme for example. Launched by three veterans of e-commerce and retail in 2011, the platform aimed to bring a breath of fresh air to the fashion market in India. 

 

Disaster struck for Yepme in 2017. Complaints of employees being underpaid emerged. At around the same time, increasing costs forced the company to close offline stores and lay off employees. In a cost-reduction spree, Yepme closed its quality control unit, along with warehousing. That was a big mistake.

 

While Yepme tried to compensate by offering discounts, they struggled to create a loyal customer base due to the continuous product quality issues. Yepme’s case goes on to show the importance of conducting thorough market research, and most importantly, ensuring that your product solves a genuine problem for a specific target audience.

 

In a very similar vein, PepperTap, a grocery delivery service that launched in 2017 burned bright and then sputtered out. They entered a market where logistical complexities were unsolved and consumer trust in online grocery shopping was not enough to sustain the business. PepperTap’s focused on rapid expansion instead. They neglected to build a robust delivery network or educate consumers about the benefits of the service. Inevitably, the wrong priorities ultimately led to their downfall.

 

The lesson here for aspiring entrepreneurs is that don’t get swept up in the excitement of a trendy concept – build a product that solves actual problems. And never mess up the fundamentals like market research, resource allocation, and quality control.


Cash Burn Conundrum


Funding is what sustains any startup. However, access to capital is a double-edged sword. A sizeable number of Indian startups have fallen victim to the “burn rate trap.” What’s that, you ask? Basically, it is prioritizing rapid growth over financial sustainability. 


Foodpanda, the online food ordering platform acquired by Ola, is a case in point. Even with heavy investor funding, their aggressive customer acquisition strategies, including hefty discounts, proved unsustainable. 


Startups often overestimate how long their runway of cash can last in pursuing growth. Without a steady revenue stream, they go bankrupt even after raising significant capital. TinyOwl, a food ordering app, had to shut shop in 2016 after running out of money, despite backing from prominent investors like Sequoia Capital.


These failures make the need for a laser focus on financial discipline crystal clear. Develop a clear path to profit, explore alternative revenue streams, and be very specific about managing cash flow. In the end, venture capitalists aren’t looking for moonshots; they back businesses with a roadmap to long-term financial viability instead.


The Problem with Execution



A brilliant idea is just the first step. What separates the doers from the dreamers is the execution of that vision. Take the example of Droom–the online marketplace for used cars.  While the concept, even though nothing new, held promise. However, Droom struggled with operational inefficiencies and a lack of trust in the online used car market.

 

While getting traction with an initial user base is important, the inability to cost-effectively acquire new users at scale is the death knell for many startups. AskMe is yet another e-commerce services firm that failed to compete with bigger players like Amazon and Flipkart as it could not reach the needed economies of scale.


Similarly, grocery delivery startup Grofers had to face major challenges in scaling its logistics network and maintaining product quality across a wide geographic area. What do we learn? That it is important to build a strong team with the expertise to navigate the hurdles of execution. 


Don’t get bogged down in fancy office furniture and endless meetings. Focus on building a minimum viable product (MVP) – a basic version of your idea that you can launch quickly and get feedback on. Test the waters, see what works, and iterate before pouring everything into a product nobody wants.

In the end, remember that startups thrive on constant iteration. Failed ventures aren’t entirely failures; they clear the way for the next big thing. So, innovate boldly, but listen closely to what the fallen ones have to say. Their wisdom might just hold the secret sauce for your next success.

Arunav Das

Arunav Das

www.mergedeck.pro

1 Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *